Black, C C. (1995). Rhetorical criticism. in Hearing the New Testament: Strategies for Interpretation. ed. J. B. Green. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Brigance, William Norwood ed., A History and Criticism of American Public Address, 2 vols. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1943). A third volume was published in 1955: Marie Kathryn Hochmuth, ed., A History and Criticism of American Public Address, III (New York: Longmans, Green, 1955).
Brock, B. L. & Scott, R. L. (Eds.). (1980). Methods of rhetorical criticism: A twentieth-century perspective (2nd ed.). Wayne State University Press.
Brock, B.L., Scott, L. & Chesebro, J.W. (1990). Methods of Rhetorical Criticism. A Twentieth-century Perspective. Third edition, revised. Detroit: Wayne State University.
Bryant, Donald C. (1958), ed., The Rhetorical Idiom: Essays in Rhetoric, Oratory, Language, and Drama (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 5.
Burke, Kenneth. (1969). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cathcart, Robert. (1966). Post Communication: Criticism and Evaluation. Indianapolis: Bobbs- Merrill.
Cox, Robert. (2010). Environnmental Communication and Public Sphere. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
Foss, Sonja K. (2018). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice (5th ed.). Waveland Press.
Herbert A. Wichelns (1980). “The Literary Criticism of Oratory,” in Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James A. Winans, ed. A. M. Drummond (New York: Century, 1925), 181–216. A more accessible source for the essay is Herbert A. Wichelns, “The Literary Criticism of Oratory,” in Methods of Rhetorical Criticism: A Twentieth-Century Perspective, ed. Bernard L. Brock and Robert L. Scott, 2nd ed. (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1980), 40–73.
Kennedy, George Alexander (1994). A New History of Classical Rhetoric. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Klyn, Mark S. (1968). “Toward a Pluralistic Rhetorical Criticism,” in Essays on Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Thomas R. Nilsen (New York: Random House, 1968), 154.
Mohrmann, G. P. & Michael C. (1974). Leff point out that neo-Aristotelianism itself does not preclude the study of discourse larger than a single speech; in fact, Aristotle discusses oratorical genres deliberative or political speaking, forensic or legal speaking, and epideictic or ceremonial speaking. The notion of genres was not incorporated into the neo-Aristotelian approach because of Wichelns’s determination that the purpose of rhetorical criticism was to uncover effects on the specific audience. See G. P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff, “Lincoln at Cooper Union: A Rationale for Neo-Classical Criticism,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, (60), 463.
Thonssen, Lester & Baird, Craig (1948). Speech Criticism. New York: Ronald.
Wendland, E. R. (2002). Aspects of Rhetorical Analysis Applied to New Testament texts. In Handbook of early Christianity: Social science approaches.ed. Blasi, A J. Duhaime, J & Turcotte P-A. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press: 169-195.
Wichelns, Herbert. A. (1925). The Literary Criticism of Oratory, in Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James A. Winans, ed. A. M. Drummond (New York: Century, 181–216.
References
Abduh, M. (1365/1986). Sharḥ Nahj al-Balāgha [Commentary on Nahj al-Balāgha] (M. Abū al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm, Ed.; 4 vols.). Lebanon: Dār al-Maʿrifa. (In Arabic)
al-Miqdād, F. (1380/2001). Kanz al-ʿIrfān fī fiqh al-Qurʾān [The treasure of gnosis in Quranic jurisprudence] (ʿA. ʿUqayqī Bakhshāyishī, Ed.). Qom: Intishārāt-i Navīd-i Islām. (In Arabic)
Azīzkhānī, M., & Shāmlī, N. (1400/2021). Taḥlīl-i guftimān-i intiqādī dar Nahj al-Balāgha bar asās-i naẓariyya-yi Furklāf (muṭāliʿa-yi mawridī: tawṣīf-i nākithīn) [Critical discourse analysis in Nahj al-Balāgha based on Fairclough’s theory: Case study of the description of the Oath-Breakers]. Pazhūhishnāma-yi Nahj al-Balāgha, 9(36), 21–37. (in Persian)
Black, C. C. (1995). Rhetorical criticism. in Hearing the New Testament: Strategies for Interpretation. ed. J. B. Green. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Bouthoul, G. (1387/2008). Jāmiʿahʹshināsī-yi Jang [Sociology of war] (H. Farrukhjasta, Trans.). Tehran: Intishārāt-i ʿIlmī Farhangī. (Original work published 1954) (in Persian)
Brigance, William Norwood, ed., A History and Criticism of American Public Address, 2 vols. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1943). A third volume was published in 1955: Marie Kathryn Hochmuth, ed., A History and Criticism of American Public Address, III (New York: Longmans, Green, 1955).
Brock, B. L. & Scott, R. L. (Eds.). (1980). Methods of rhetorical criticism: A twentieth-century perspective (2nd ed.). Wayne State University Press.
Brock, B.L., Scott, L. & Chesebro, J.W. (1990). Methods of Rhetorical Criticism. A Twentieth-century Perspective. Third edition, revised. Detroit: Wayne State University.
Bryant, Donald C., ed., The Rhetorical Idiom: Essays in Rhetoric, Oratory, Language, and Drama (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1958), 5.
Burke, Kenneth. (1969). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cathcart, Robert. (1966). Post Communication: Criticism and Evaluation. Indianapolis: Bobbs- Merrill.
Cox, Robert. (2010). Environnmental Communication and Public Sphere. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
Dashtī, M. (1379/2000). Tarjuma-yi Nahj al-Balāgha [Translation of Nahj al-Balāgha]. Tehran: Muʾassisa-yi Farhangī Intishārātī-yi Amīr Kabīr. (In Persian)
edition of the book, a third author was added: Lester Thonssen, A. Craig Baird, and Waldo W. Braden, Speech Criticism, 2nd ed. (New York: Ronald, 1970).
G. P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff point out that neo-Aristotelianism itself does not preclude the study of discourse larger than a single speech; in fact, Aristotle discusses oratorical genres deliberative or political speaking, forensic or legal speaking, and epideictic or ceremonial speaking. The notion of genres was not incorporated into the neo-Aristotelian approach because of Wichelns’s determination that the purpose of rhetorical criticism was to uncover effects on the specific audience. See G. P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff, “Lincoln at Cooper Union: A Rationale for Neo-Classical Criticism,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 60 (December 1974): 463.
Ḥasan ʿAbbās, F. (1997). al-Balāgha: Funūnuhā wa afnānuhā [Rhetoric: Its arts and branches]. Jordan: Dār al-Furqān. (In Arabic)
Herbert A. Wichelns, “The Literary Criticism of Oratory,” in Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James A. Winans, ed. A. M. Drummond (New York: Century, 1925), 181–216. A more accessible source for the essay is Herbert A. Wichelns, “The Literary Criticism of Oratory,” in Methods of Rhetorical Criticism: A Twentieth-Century Perspective, ed. Bernard L. Brock and Robert L. Scott, 2nd ed. (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1980), 40–73.
Ibn Abī al-Ḥadīd, ʿA. (1385/2006). Sharḥ Nahj al-Balāgha [Commentary on Nahj al-Balāgha] (M. Ibrāhīm, Ed.; 20 vols.). Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya. (In Arabic)
Jaʿfarī, M. T. (1360/1981). Tafsīr-i Nahj al-Balāgha [Exegesis of Nahj al-Balāgha] (7 vols.). Tehran: Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i Islāmī. (In Persian)
Kennedy, George Alexander. (1994). A New History of Classical Rhetoric. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Klyn, Mark S., “Toward a Pluralistic Rhetorical Criticism,” in Essays on Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Thomas R. Nilsen (New York: Random House, 1968), 154.
Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, M. T. (1383/2004). Jang wa jihād dar Qurʾān [War and jihad in the Quran] (M. M. Nādirī Qummī & M. Ḥ. Iskandarī, Comps.). Qom: Muʾassisa-yi Āmūzishī va Pizhūhishī-yi Imām Khumaynī (RA). (In Persian)
Moore, J. D. (1389/2010). Zindigī wa andīsha-yi buzurgān-i insānʹshināsī: Muqaddamaʾī bar naẓariyyaʹpardāzān va naẓariyyaʹhā-yi insānʹshinākhtī [Visions of culture: An introduction to anthropological theories and theorists] (J. Aḥmadī & H. Āqā Bīg Pūrī, Trans.). Tehran: Jāmiʿaʹshināsān. (Original work published 1997) (In Persian)
Mughniyya, M. J. (1379/2000). Fī ẓilāl Nahj al-Balāgha [In the shade of Nahj al-Balāgha] (H. Mīlānī, Trans.; 4 vols.). Qom: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī. (in Arabic, Persian translation)
Muʿīn, M. (1360/1981). Farhang-i Fārsī-yi Muʿīn [Muʿīn’s Persian dictionary] (Vol. 1). Tehran: Intishārāt-i Amīr Kabīr. (In Persian)
Muṭahharī, M. (1358/1979). Wilāyat wa rahbarī [Guardianship and leadership]. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Ṣadrā. (In Persian)
Naṣrī, ʿA. (1399/2020). Tarjuma wa tafsīr-i Nahj al-Balāgha: Ḥikmat-i uṣūl-i siyāsī-yi Islām (tafsīr-i farmān-i Amīr al-Muʾminīn (ʿa) bi Mālik Ashtar) [Translation and exegesis of Nahj al-Balāgha: The wisdom of Islamic political principles (exegesis of the decree of the Commander of the Faithful to Mālik al-Ashtar)] (M. T. Jaʿfarī Tabrīzī, Trans.; ʿA. Jaʿfarī, Comp.). Tehran: Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i Islāmī. (In Persian)
Ṣāliḥ, Ṣ. (1967). Nahj al-Balāgha [Arabic edition with investigation and annotations]. Lebanon: Dār al-Kitāb al-Lubnānī. (In Arabic)
Sharīʿatī, ʿA. (1350/1971). ʿAlī tanhā ast [Ali is alone]. Tehran: Ḥusayniyya-yi Irshād. (In Persian)
Sonja K. Foss (2018). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice (5th ed.). Waveland Press.
Thonssen, Lester and A. Craig Baird, Speech Criticism (New York: Ronald, 1948). In the second
Wendland, E. R. (2002). Aspects of Rhetorical Analysis Applied to New Testament texts. In Handbook of early Christianity: Social science approaches.ed. Blasi, A J. Duhaime, J & Turcotte P-A. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press: 169-195.
Wichelns, Herbert. A. (1925). The Literary Criticism of Oratory, in Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking in Honor of James A. Winans, ed. A. M. Drummond (New York: Century, 181–216.
