ضرورت آموزش شیوه‌ها و مهارت‌های گفت‌وگوی ادیان

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار و عضو هیئت‌علمی گروه ادیان و عرفان تطبیقی دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران
چکیده
در روزگار ما با وجود جنگ‌های عقیدتی، مهاجرت و جهانی‌شدن، گفت‌وگو پدیده‌ای اجتناب‌ناپذیر است. در مقام مقایسه، در جهان غرب، مسیحیان شخصیت اصلی گفت‌وگوی بین‌دینی هستند و روحانیون مسیحی تکنیک‌ها و روش‌های آن را فرا می‌گیرند؛ درحالی‌که مسلمانان که مهم‌ترین هدف گفت‌وگوی مسیحیان هستند، کمتر به آموزش روش‌ها و فنون گفت‌وگوی بین ادیان در آموزشگاه‌های خود می‌پردازند. مسئله اصلی این مقاله آن است که دانشگاه چه نسبتی با موضوع گفت‌وگوی ادیان دارد؟ آیا انتظار نقش‌آفرینی دانشگاه در این زمینه با رسالت دانشگاه مغایر است یا بالعکس؟ دانشگاه با چه سازوکاری می‌تواند به این موضوع بپردازد تا نتایج در خوری به دست آورد؟ زیربنای این آموزش باید دانش تحول‌گرا، اخلاق‌محور و ارزش‌بنیان باشد. این دانش در وهله نخست موجب شناخت ارزش‌ها و اهداف ادیان و در گام بعدی، موجب احترام به ویژگی‌های فرهنگی و اجتماعی سنت‌های دینی مختلف می‌شود. برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی برای آموزش گفت‌وگوی ادیان، رسالت دانشگاهی است که در پی حقیقت، صلح و رفاه اجتماعی از طریق آموزش و پژوهش است. این مقاله متکفّل تبیین ضرورت آموزش گفت‌وگوی ادیان در دانشگاه به شیوۀ تحلیلی و توصیفی است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The need to teach methods and skills of interfaith dialogue

نویسنده English

Khalil Hakimifar
Assistant Professor and Member of the Faculty of Comparative Religions and Mysticism, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده English

The phenomenon such as Ideological war, immigration, globalization, etc. make dialogues among religions inevitable. The Christians comparatively are the main players to have dialogue among religions so, their clergymen have been trained many techniques to be successful in this matter. Meanwhile this issue has been mostly neglected among Muslims who are the most important target for dialogue. The main issue in this essay are as below: -What responsibility the university has in dialogue among religions? -is there any contradiction between the expecting role-playing of university and its responsibility? -How university can access the needed results? It seems, it is university’s responsibility to have planning and strategy for teaching dialogue among religions which is truly possible through peace and social welfare and research, Because the infrastructure for teaching dialogue among religions should be knowledge-oriented, effective, ethical and value-base. This knowledge beside formulating values and goals of religions, it creates respects to cultural and social features of different religions. The current essay has been assigned to formulate the necessity of teaching dialogue among religions at university by descriptive- analytic method.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

course unit
dialogue
methods
skills
religions and theosophy
Anna Halsall & Bert Roebben (2006), “Intercultural and Interfaith Dialogue through Education, Religious Education, 101: 4, 443-452, DOI: 10.1080/00344080600948571
Astin, Alexander; Helen, S., Lindholm, Jennifer (January February 2011), “Assessing Students Spiritual and Religious Qualities, Journal of College Student Development, Johns Hopkins University Press, Vol. 52, Number 1.
Byrne, Máire (27 Jan. 2020), Interfaith Dialogue and Comparative Theology”, “The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: A Basis for Interfaith Dialogue, London: Continuum, 2001. 1-8. Bloomsbury Collections. http: //dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472549464.ch-001
Campbell, David E.; Putnam, Robert D. (December 2011), “Americas Grace: How a Tolerant Nation Bridges Its Religious Divides, Political Science Quarterly, 126 (4).
Cheetham, David (June 2005), “The University and Interfaith Education”, Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, No. 1.
Gurin, P., Nagda, B. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004), “The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship”, Journal of Social Issues, 60 (1).
Harper. Kimball, C. (2002), When Religion Becomes Evil. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
Interfaith Education for all: Theoretical Perspectives and Best Practices for Transformative Action, (2017), Edited by Duncan R. Wielzen and Ina Ter Avest, Sense Publishers Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei.
Joseph L. Subbiondo, (2012), “Religious Pluralism, Global Peace, and Higher Education”, Islamic Studies (AICIS) XII, Surabaya: IAIN Sunan Ampel.
King, M.; Boxter Magolda, M. B. (2005), A developmental model of intercultural maturity, Journal of college student development, 46.
Kipling, Rudyard (1940), Rudyard Kiplings Verse (Definitive ed.), Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Love Patrick & Talbot. Donna, (2009), “Defining Spiritual Development: A Missing Consideration for Student Affairs, Journal NASPA Journal, Vol. 46, Issue 4.
McIntyre, A. (1990), Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry, London: Duckworth.
Merton. Thomas, (1967), Mystics and Zen masters, New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Riera, J. (2013), Walking the labyrinth: Examining the intersection of spirituality and leadership among senior student affairs administrators. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 301. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/ docview/1432744069? accountid=10223.(1432744069).
RumyanaIlcheva Neminska, (2015), Education for Interreligious Dialouge. Interactive Situational Methods for Learning of Students, International Journal of Information Research and Review, Vol. 2, Issue, 12.
Russell, Krebs Stephani (2014), Dissertation Issertation Voices of Interfaith Dialogue: A Phenomenological Analysis, submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements”, For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado, Summer 2014.
Taylor, R. (1967), “The Meaning of Dialogue”, In: H. J. Singh (Ed.), Inter-religious Dialogue. Bangalore: CISRS.
Teasdale, W. (1999), The mystic heart, Novato, Discovering a Universal Spirituality in the Worlds Religions, CA: New World Library.
Toledo Guiding Principleson Teaching about Religion and Belifsin Public Scools, (1975), Published by the OSCE Offi ce for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Printed in Poland by Sungraf.
United States Institute Report of peace, Special Report, (DC 2003) 1200 17th Street NW Washington.
Viera, J. A. (2012), Exploring participant experience of interfaith dialogue: A case study on encounters with the religious other, (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (Accession Order No. 3511201).
Williams, B. (2002), Truth and Truthfulness, Princeton: Princeton University Press.